Thinking reflection · LT

Strategic Thinking

A 15-situation reflection on three moves that often matter in strategic thinking: seeing systems, changing the frame and learning from decisions.

15 situations3 dimensionsLithuanianBrowser-only

Start reflection ↗Understand the model

What it explores

Strategic thinking is not treated here as one score. The experiment separates three different habits of thought and asks which ones appear more naturally in your choices.

The three-part structure is inspired by strategic thinking research that distinguishes systems thinking, reframing and reflection.

Three thinking moves

SystemsLooking beyond the local problem to relationships, consequences, assumptions and the wider system.

ReframeChanging the question, perspective or problem definition instead of only searching harder inside the original frame.

ReflectExamining decisions, assumptions, successes and failures so that experience becomes usable learning.

Why there is no single “strategic” score

A total score can hide an interesting imbalance. Someone may see systems well but rarely challenge the original frame. Another person may generate alternative views but move on too quickly to learn from outcomes.

The profile is therefore more useful as three directions to compare than as a ranking of how “strategic” you are.

How to use the result

Start with the least-used direction and choose one practice to try for a month: assumption checks, scenario alternatives, after-action reviews, opposing viewpoints or cross-functional mapping.

This 2rasi experiment is inspired by strategic thinking literature and the three-dimension STQ structure, but it is not the official STQ questionnaire and is not a validated diagnostic instrument.